Saturday, 28 June 2014
MsSolidarity's blog : My Work
MsSolidarity's blog : My Work: As freelance writer I contribute articles on wide variety of topics on local and international politics. www.hersay.co.uk I fo...
Tuesday, 17 June 2014
Abduction of 3 Israeli teens to escalate tensions.
The imploding
situation created by the ISIS and Syria is unleashing human misery
requires immediate actions and those earnestly hopeful of ending the violence
through political means are not getting the message. Middle East
is smouldering in flames but the tragedy unfolds rather sinisterly when children
are used as shields to make gains and negotiate deals, possibly to swap
prisoners who maybe wanted in some serious terror related crimes. When besieged
by likelihood of defeat, the attacking and mutilating of human instincts and
emotions becomes a winnable formula for the militants.
The recent
incident of three Israeli teenagers abducted in the West Bank has escalated the
tensions between Israel
and the new Palestinian government. The distraught face of Naftali Frenkel ’s
mother trying to give hope to her son that very soon he will come back home is
troublesome to watch. Like any other mother the first and foremost concern for
her will be the safety of her son when he leaves home. To forcefully withhold
and keep away any child from the safety of his/her home and family environment
is a tactic which sends a message of fear and intimidation by the perpetrators.
People in Israel
are worried not only for the safety of those three boys; they are concerned as
to how the situation in an already precarious environment where so much
uncertainty exists will unfold for them, as the days will pass by.
If Hamas is
behind these kidnappings it is a tragedy for those Muslims who want to live
alongside the Jews and have nothing to do with the tactics of intimidation. It
is every child’s right to acquire education but religious extremism
indoctrinated to support extreme measures of violence has turned many children
into Jihadist fighters. To be used as instruments to support Islamic ideologies
which encourage individuals to accept fighting as a just cause is now blatantly
accepted by the radicals who indoctrinate young minds to take up arms and
weapons and chant Quranic verses. So many young children are being robbed of
their childhood because chances of peace are hijacked by the terrorists who
will mastermind extreme acts to suit their own vested interests.
AT a time
when options for peaceful settlement between the Palestinians and the Israelis
should have exceeded this incident will create repercussions which will further
divide them and will lead to tensions, fear and uncertainty in the region.
Thursday, 12 June 2014
The Iraq War legacy---why is it so blurred!
The article was previously published in http://thebackbencher.co.uk/ on 3 March, 2013.
So it is ten years after the invasion of Iraq by the
coalition forces. The speculation that the decision to go to the war was a
disastrous mistake which ultimately eroded public trust in the politicians and
gave rise to sentiments that intervention can only lead to protectionism and safeguarding
of self-interest still reigns down heavily against the judgment that Saddam
Hussain was a brutal dictator involved in the genocide of Kurdish people and
severely suppressed freedom of speech among his own people.
Any argument in favour of replacing the regime to uplift the
economic conditions of the country which by the year 2003 had a weak and
deteriorating economic structure, despite being ranked seventh in the list of
oil producing nations, is proven weak by the anti-war protestors and the peace
activists who rally around the argument that economic sanctions were enough to
remove Saddam Hussein.
Leaving aside the statistics, various available data
analysis and the reports on the build-up of the decision that war was
inevitable there can be little validation to the fact that there is no
accountability of the objectives and methods employed by the single entity of
power to establish the rule of law which infringes human rights. Dictatorship
thrives on absolute power and an individual who wants total control over social
and economic organizations will rely on a highly developed ideology to justify
doing so. And if Islamization is supported as the rule of law it is the women
who suffer the most.
Whether it is the right to drive a car without the need of a
chaperone or the ultimate necessity to give protection to the victim of rape
and not demand witnesses to prove that the crime had been committed, if the basic
argument rests against the need to change these practices because the
principles of a faith interpret it differently than it cannot lead to an equal
status of women in society. Strict interpretation of Quran in many parts of the
world has become an exception to morally validate the case that women should
apply a social code which was established in the advent of Islam. With no laws
in place to allow freedom of speech and open debate very little can be achieved
to make women feel secure and safe. A dictator will choose any law that gives
him immunity from leaving power and time and again in the Muslim world the
ideals of sharia law have been upheld by totalitarian regimes.
Let us not be deluded by the belief that an organized system
of governance brings prosperity where voices which seek change are suppressed
and made to remain silence. Iraq
has seen its share of tragedy, much need to be done to keep it stable and away
from the chaos of a civil war but then for the first time people have the right
to vote in general elections. Every war has its ugly consequences but then can
we justify the emergence of dictators! The cries to silence the support for the
intervention in Iraq
blur the objectives----lamenting the reasons for the overthrow of dictatorship
is intellectual laziness which hinders taking responsibility for change.
Monday, 9 June 2014
Trojan horse plot—what should Muslims do.
Some are not
only questioning the facts behind the Trojan horse report, they are blaming it
as a smear campaign against those members of the Muslim community of Birmingham,
who want their children to be educated so as to be better informed about
knowledge of Islam.
The
extremist character of the schools originated because there was a demand for a
system of education that is to make children well aware of a certain Islamic
character which can sometimes conflict with the secular curriculum. To make a
clear definition of what exactly constitute as a conflict between secular
education and religious Islamic education I found the answer in the bloghtt://imanshomeschool.wordpress.com conclusive. The author of the blog is a
Muslim mother who gives home-schooling to her five children because she
believes this method of teaching ‘freely interlink’ secular education with
religious beliefs. Among other preferences for giving home schooling, she also highlights
the freedom to choose not to study Evolution Theory or teach it in light of ‘our
religious belief.’ She goes on to explain that she has set aside a dedicated
amount of work for Islamic Studies which includes reading Quran, its commentary
(tafsir), books of hadith and explanations from scholars as part of the lesson
plans for her children. The blog has all the relevant information for anyone
interested in starting home-schooling with emphasis on Islamic education—from Muslim home-school planners to
Home Education UK and necessary text book to teach children maths, literacy,
religion the web-links are there. What I find distressing is the mother’s
preference for English Grammar pages where worksheets of nouns, verbs,
articles, conjunctions, syllables, suffixes, prefixes, prepositions have images
of characters with no physical features and some showed little girls wearing
head coverings. The strict interpretation of Islam forbids drawing images of
human beings and animals and many families readily accept material for children
where drawing of physical features is omitted. Surely a child who is given to
accept this belief will find it hard to assimilate with the secular world
around him or her later in life. The division between the world confined to
religious interpretation and the outside world will lead to extremist thoughts
and sense of seclusion since no interplay between cultural influences from the
society have been allowed to penetrate.
I doubt the
reasons would be any different for some of the parents, governors or teachers
who allowed the schools to overly adopt the local Muslim culture in the schools
involved in the inspection which led to the Trojan horse report in Birmingham . ‘Localism’
cannot be confused with religiosity and schools should not be allowed to nurture
young minds on the ideas which only lead them to the understanding that an
identity based on belief and faith is what essentially matters.
In secular
societies faith is a personal matter and Britain ’s secular outlook has never
been a challenge to Muslim communities all over the country. The debate
culminating from the ‘Trojan horse’ plot
is not about immigration, Islamophobia or education secretary’s insistence that
institutions should be under a centralist control. It is time for Muslim
community to rise above ethos and sensibilities which create division with the
secular world.
Worksheets with faces without expressions and little girls in head scarves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)